MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3176527769 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.24.21259102

Resolution limit-free community detection reveals unique patterns of resting-state network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder: A PGC-ENIGMA PTSD Consortium investigation

2021· preprint· en· W3176527769 on OpenAlexaff
Marisa Ross, Josh M. Cisler, Saskia B.J. Koch, Miranda Olff, Dick J. Veltman, Laura Nawijn, Jessie L. Frijling, Mirjam van Zuiden, Xi Zhu, Yuval Neria, Benjamin Suarez‐Jimenez, Tor D. Wager, Courtney C. Haswell, Michael D. De Bellis, Emily K. Clarke‐Rubright, Jennifer S. Stevens, Sanne J.H. van Rooij, Negar Fani, Tanja Jovanović, Kerry J. Ressler, Judith K. Daniels, Henrik Walter, Antje Manthey, Anika Sierk, Pavel Říha, Ivan Rektor, Richard J. Davidson, Jack B. Nitschke, Daniel W. Grupe, Christine L. Larson, Terri A. deRoon‐Cassini, Jacklynn M. Fitzgerald, Ashley A. Huggins, Carissa Weis, Ruth A. Lanius, Maria Densmore, Lauren A. M. Lebois, Milissa L. Kaufman, Justin T. Baker, Thomas Straube, Paula Neumeister, David Hofmann, Amit Etkin, Adi Maron‐Katz, Anthony P. King, Israel Liberzon, Ryan J. Herringa, Xin Wang, Tian Chen, Andrew S. Cotton, Erin N. O’Leary, Hong Xie, Seth G. Disner, Nicholas D. Davenport, Wissam El‐Hage, Yann Quidé, Elbert Geuze, Mitzy Kennis, Evan M. Gordon, Geoffery May, Meilin Jia-Richards, Steven E. Bruce, Ilya M. Veer, Lea Waller, Hannah Berg, Shmuel Lissek, Rajendra A. Morey, Scott R. Sponheim

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDefault mode networkPosttraumatic stressResting state fMRINeuroimagingPsychologyPsychiatryNeuroscienceFunctional connectivityClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→