MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The effects of passive heating and subsequent exercise in the heat on lipid metabolism

2012· article· en· W3176580789 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Pinet, Jean‐François Mauger, François Haman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriglycerideChemistryLipid metabolismNEFAPhospholipidInternal medicineEndocrinologyCalorimetryTreadmillCholesterolBiochemistryFatty acidMedicineThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this study was to examine the effects of heat exposure on lipid metabolism during passive heating and subsequent exercise in the heat by focusing on changes in whole‐body lipid utilization and plasma lipids. Male participants (n=8) were passively heated for 120 min at 42°C, then exercised on a treadmill in the heat at 50% VO2peak for 30 min (HEAT), and on a separate occasion followed the same procedure at 23°C (CON). Results showed that whole‐body lipid utilization rates were not different between HEAT and CON during passive heating and during exercise. At rest, non‐esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were significantly higher following passive heating (618 ± 59 μmol/l) compared to CON (391 ± 51 μmol/l). The same trend was observed following exercise (2036 ± 183 μmol/l and 1350 ± 147 μmol/l for HEAT and CON respectively). Triglyceride, phospholipid and cholesterol levels were not different between HEAT and CON following passive heating or exercise. We conclude that heat exposure results in higher circulating NEFAs both at rest and during exercise without significant changes in whole‐body lipid utilization. CIHR graduate student scholarship and NSERC to F. Haman

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→