MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Novel Monomodular and Multifunctional Processive β‐1,4‐Endoglucanase Has Been Identified and Characterized from Porcine Gut Microbiome

2018· article· en· W3176604138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Weijun Wang, Tania Archbold, Joseph S. Lam, Matthew S. Kimber, Ming Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellulaseBiochemistryCelluloseCarboxymethyl celluloseXyloglucanChemistryEnzymeTrypsinGlycoside hydrolaseBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellulose‐degrading enzymes play an important role in dietary fibre digestion of humans and animals, as well as in multiple industrial applications. Herein, a plasmid metagenomic expression library was constructed for mining cellulose‐degrading enzymes from the pig hindgut microbiota that was modulated by feeding a purified crystalline cellulose supplemented diet (Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 90 (Suppl. 4):400–402). One of the cellulase genes screened from this library was localized to a 2949‐base pair insert fragment p4818. Within the sequence preceding this enzyme‐coding region, ‐10 and ‐35 promoter elements were identified along with three transcription‐factor binding sites. The enzyme possesses a catalytic domain consistent with those of the glycoside hydrolase family 5 subfamily 2 (GH5_2), thus named as p4818Cel5_2A. The protein was overexpressed, purified, and characterized; and it displayed optimal enzymatic activity at pH 6.0 and 50 °C. The enzyme also exhibited resilience to trypsin digestion, where >70 % activity was retained after 6.0 h incubation with trypsin at 37 °C. p4818Cel5_2A exhibited a broad substrate profile with the highest specific activity towards β‐glucan, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), followed by hydroxyethyl‐cellulose and regenerated amorphous cellulose (RAC). The enzyme was also active on other substrates including crystalline cellulose substrates such as Avicel and Solkafloc, as well as the hemicelluloses of glucomannan and xyloglucan. Furthermore, based on viscosity and hydrolysis product analyses, the enzyme behaved like a typical endo‐β‐1,4‐glucanase, and displayed processivity towards RAC. In summary, p4818Cel5_2A exhibited novel enzyme properties for potential industrial applications. Support or Funding Information Related research activities have been supported by grants (to M.Z.F.) from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) New Directions & Alternative Renewable Fuels Research Program; and the University of Guelph Gryphon's LAAIR (Leading to Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Research) program. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→