Relação entre a história de adversidade juvenil e a dificuldade emocional: empatia e alexitimia = Relationship between the history of youth adversity and emotional difficulty: empathy and alexithymia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alguns estudos tem vindo a relacionar a historia de adversidade na infância com a alexitimia e com a empatia. Adultos que experienciaram adversidade infantil apresentam maior probabilidade de desenvolver alexitimia e evidenciam maior propensao em desenvolver baixos niveis de empatia. A presente investigacao pretendeu avaliar a relacao entre a historia de adversidade juvenil e a alexitimia em idade adulta e entre a historia de adversidade juvenil e a empatia na idade adulta. Pretendeu tambem analisar a relacao entre a historia de adversidade infantil e a perpetracao de comportamentos de agressao e entre esses mesmos comportamentos e a alexitimia e a empatia. Participaram 92 individuos de nacionalidade portuguesa, com idades compreendidas entre os 20 e os 63 anos ( M = 40.23, DP = 12.14). Os participantes responderam a um protocolo online constituido por um questionario sociodemografico, pelo Questionario de Historia na Infância (ACE), pela Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20) e pelo Indice de Reatividade Interpessoal (IRI). Os resultados permitiram constatar que a historia de adversidade juvenil se correlaciona de forma negativa com a empatia e de forma positiva com a alexitimia. Os resultados tambem identificaram correlacoes estatisticamente significativas positivas entre a historia de adversidade na infância e a perpetracao de comportamentos violentos por parte dos participantes e entre a perpetracao de comportamentos violentos e a alexitimia. Os resultados desta investigacao apontam para o impacto negativo destas experiencias infantis na vida adulta, sublinhando a importância de se desenvolverem programas de intervencao nesta area. Some studies have linked the history of adversity in childhood with alexithymia and empathy. Individuals who have experienced childhood adversity are more likely to develop alexithymia and are more likely to develop low levels of empathy. The present research aimed to assess the relationship between the history of juvenile adversity and alexithymia in adulthood and between the history of juvenile adversity and empathy in adulthood. It also intended to analyze the relationship between the history of juvenile adversity and the commitment of aggressive behaviors and between those same aggressive behaviors and alexithymia and empathy. The sample was composed of 92 Portuguese individuals, aged between 20 and 63 years old ( M = 40.23, SD = 12.14). Participants responded to an online protocol consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Childhood History Questionnaire (ACE), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). The results showed that the history of youth adversity correlates negatively with empathy and positively with alexithymia. The results also identified statistically significant positive correlations between the history of childhood adversity and the commitment of aggressive behavior and between the commitment of aggressive behavior and alexithymia. The results of this investigation point to the impact of these childhood experiences on adult life, underlining the importance of developing intervention programs in this field. Palavras-chave / Keyword: Historia de adversidade juvenil, Empatia, Alexitimia. History of juvenile adversity, Empathy, Alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".