MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

mTOR‐dependent selective translation rapidly expands lysosome biogenesis, volume and retention capacity during phagocyte activatio

2018· article· en· W3176700052 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Roberto J. Botelho, Victoria E. B. Hipolito, Kristofferson Tandoc, Ivan Topisirović

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRyerson University
KeywordsLysosomeTFEBCell biologyAutophagyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayEndocytosisBiologyATG16L1mTORC1EndosomeProtein kinase BSignal transductionCellBiochemistryIntracellularApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular mechanisms that govern and adapt the number, size, morphology and activities of organelles to suit the needs of the many cell types and conditions that these cells may encounter are at the frontier of cell biology. Lysosomes are organelles that degrade cargo from various routes including endocytosis, phagocytosis and autophagy. Lysosomes have also emerged as a signalling platform that senses and integrates stress signals such as nutrient deprivation with regulatory kinase hubs like mTOR and AMPK to modulate metabolic activity. For phagocytes and antigen‐presenting cells like macrophages and dendritic cells, lysosomes are a kingpin organelle since they are essential to kill pathogens, and process and ultimately present antigens. During phagocyte activation with lipopolysaccharides, lysosomes undergo a striking reorganization, changing from dozens of globular objects to a tubular network, in a process that requires the phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase‐Akt‐mTOR signalling axis. Ultimately, lysosome tubulation is thought to promote pinocytic retention and antigen presentation. Here, we show that lysosome tubulation is accompanied by a rapid boost in lysosome volume and holding capacity of phagocyte activation. We reveal that lysosome expansion depends on biosynthesis of lysosomal proteins but is independent of TFEB and TFE3, transcription factors known to scale up lysosome biogenesis. Instead, we show that lysosome transcripts are selectively targeted for enhanced protein translation in an mTOR‐dependent manner. Indeed, lysosome transcripts were enriched in polyribosome fractions after lipopolysaccharide exposure in an mTOR‐dependent manner, while transcripts encoding non‐lysosomal proteins were unresponsive to LPS and/or mTOR inhibition. Collectively, we identified an example of rapid organelle expansion and remodelling driven by enhanced and selective protein translation during phagocyte activation. Support or Funding Information Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chair Program, and Ryerson University This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→