MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cloning and characterization of novel CTP: phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase (Pcyt2) isoforms made by alternative splicing

2012· article· en· W3176708430 on OpenAlexafffund
Zvezdan Pavlovic, Marica Bakovic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIntronExonBiologyAlternative splicingGene isoformRNA splicingGeneticsCloning (programming)Complementary DNAGeneMolecular biologyComputational biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pcyt2 controls the rate limiting step of de novo biosynthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine. We previously identified the exon‐7 skipping as a mechanism for alternative splicing of two different Pcyt2 isoforms, Pcyt2α and Pcyt2β. Homology searches of genome databases indicated the presence of additional Pcyt2 transcripts. In order to isolate and characterize those alternative transcripts, we used total cDNA prepared from C 2 C 12 and multiple mouse tissues. Methodology included specific PCR amplification, cloning into pGEMt vector and sequencing. We detected two distinctive Pcyt2 isoforms, named γ1 and γ2. The Pcyt2γ1 is a longer form, composed of exons 1–8 and two additional regions from introns 7 and 8. The first intronic segment of 184 bp located at the beginning of intron 7 was named γ‐specific region 1. Next, exon 8 was followed by 258 bp of sequence from intron 8, named γ‐specific region 2. The new isoforms resemble the first half of Pcyt2α in containing the first catalytic site and in maintaining the exon 7 linker peptide region. Pcyt2γ1 contains two additional regions made of partial introns 7 and 8, while Pcyt2γ2 retains only parts of intron 8. This composition made the C‐terminal ends of both γ1 and γ2 completely different from isoform Pcyt2α. Both isororms were expressed in different mouse tissues as well as in mouse embryos at different stages of development. This research was supported by CIHR research grant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→