MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176929085 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqab078

Indicators Differentiating Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura From Other Thrombotic Microangiopathies in a Canadian Apheresis Referral Center

2021· article· en· W3176929085 on OpenAlexaffabout
Spencer D. Martin, Eric McGinnis, Tyler Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraMedicineThrombotic microangiopathyADAMTS13Microangiopathic hemolytic anemiaInternal medicineApheresisTherapeutic plasma exchangePopulationPlasmapheresisCreatinineGastroenterologyPlateletImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by ADAMTS13 deficiency with mortality of up to 90% in the absence of treatment, typically therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). TTP presents similarly to other TMAs in which TPE is ineffective and associated with morbidity and additional costs. Thus, we sought to assess clinical and laboratory parameters differentiating TTP from other TMAs in our institution's catchment population. METHODS: We reviewed 8 years of data from a Canadian provincial apheresis center, including 100 patients with suspected TMA who underwent ADAMTS13 testing, 35 of whom were diagnosed with TTP. We assessed clinical and laboratory parameters to identify discriminators of TTP and assigned PLASMIC TTP prediction scores. RESULTS: We observed a higher frequency of neurologic symptoms, more severe thrombocytopenia, and less creatinine elevation in TTP relative to other TMAs. High PLASMIC scores (6-7 points) had 83% sensitivity and 88% specificity for TTP diagnoses; however, ADAMTS13 activity testing was required for correct diagnoses in 14 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and laboratory parameters including PLASMIC scoring may lead to misdiagnosis in some cases of TMA. ADAMST13 activity testing provides definitive diagnosis of TTP, supporting the role of rapid turnaround ADAMTS13 testing for appropriate treatment of TMAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical PathologySame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207