MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Caspase‐Dependent Septic Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cell Barrier Dysfunction is Associated with Vascular Endothelial‐Cadherin Disruption

2018· article· en· W3176945071 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sean E. Gill, Lefeng Wang, Justin J. Chung, Sanjay Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTUNEL assayApoptosisCaspaseCell biologyBiologyBarrier functionEndothelial stem cellProgrammed cell deathBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Sepsis often causes dysfunction of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVEC) leading to severe pulmonary edema. We previously reported in a murine model of sepsis that lung injury, including PMVEC barrier dysfunction, was strongly caspase‐dependent, and associated with PMVEC apoptosis. The mechanism through which caspases mediate PMVEC barrier function, however, was not determined. The classic role of caspases is the initiation and execution of apoptosis; however, caspases have important biological functions other than apoptosis. Indeed, caspases can cleave multiple targets, including proteins associated with cell‐cell junctions. Objective To identify the mechanisms through which caspases regulate septic PMVEC barrier dysfunction. Hypothesis PMVEC barrier dysfunction in sepsis is mediated by caspase‐dependent disruption of inter‐PMVEC junctions. Methods Human PMVEC cultured alone or in co‐culture with neutrophils (PMN) were stimulated with cytomix (equimolar tumour necrosis factor α, interleukin 1β and interferon γ to mimic septic conditions). PMVEC barrier function was assessed by flux of Evans blue labelled‐albumin in a transwell assay. Specific microscopic localization of leak was determined by imaging paracellular fluorescein isothiocyanate labelled‐avidin leak across PMVEC monolayers in biotin‐coated wells. PMVEC apoptosis was examined using 3 markers: caspase activation (FLICA staining), loss of cell membrane polarity (Annexin V staining), and DNA fragmentation (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling [TUNEL] staining). PMVEC cell‐cell junctions were examined using immunofluorescence with antibodies against vascular endothelial (VE)‐cadherin. Results We found that co‐culture of PMVEC with PMN significantly disrupts PMVEC barrier function under both basal and septic conditions vs. PMVEC cultured alone. Compared to cytomix‐treated PMVEC alone, the presence of PMN also significantly enhanced septic PMVEC caspase activation (FLICA staining), but this increase did not appear to be associated with any change in PMVEC apoptosis (Annexin V or TUNEL staining) vs. PMVEC cultured alone. We also found that microscopic paracellular leak co‐localized around cells positive for caspase activity, and was highly associated with disruption of circumferential PMVEC surface VE‐cadherin staining (97.1%). Moreover, PMVEC treatment with Q‐VD, a pan‐caspase inhibitor, rescued the septic barrier dysfunction, microscopic leak, and VE‐cadherin disruption. Conclusion Our data demonstrates that neutrophil presence enhances caspase‐dependent septic PMVEC barrier dysfunction independently of PMVEC apoptosis partly through disruption of VE‐cadherin. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by research funding from the Ontario Thoracic Society (S. Gill), the Program of Experimental Medicine (S. Gill and S. Mehta), and the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Ontario/Canada grants #G‐16‐00014621 (S. Mehta and S. Gill). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→