MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176959987 · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00216

Querying for Interactions

2021· article· en· W3176959987 on OpenAlexaff
Yannis Xarchakos, Nick Koudas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceObject (grammar)Frame (networking)Class (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceSequence (biology)Video trackingComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in Deep Learning and Computer Vision enabled sophisticated information extraction out of images and video frames. Recent research aims to make objects, their types and relative locations as the video evolves, first class citizens for query processing purposes.In this paper, we initiate research to explore declarative style of querying for real time video streams involving objects and their interactions. We seek to efficiently identify frames in a streaming video in which an object is interacting with another in a specific way, such as for example a human kicking a ball. We first propose an algorithm called progressive filters (PF) that deploys a sequence of inexpensive and less accurate models (filters) to detect the presence of the query specified objects on frames. We demonstrate that PF derives a least cost sequence of filters given the current selectivities of query objects. Since selectivities may vary as the video evolves, we present a dynamic statistical test to determine when to trigger re-optimization of the filters. Finally, we present a filtering approach called Interaction Sheave (IS) that utilizes learned spatial information about objects and interactions to effectively prune frames that are unlikely to involve the query specified action between them, thus improving the frame processing rate further.We present the results of a thorough experimental evaluation involving real data sets, demonstrating the performance benefits of each of our proposals. In particular we experimentally demonstrate that our techniques can improve query performance substantially (up to an order of magnitude in our experiments) while maintaining essentially the same F1-score as alternatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207