MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of Equilibrative Nucleoside (Adenosine) Transporters on the preBötzinger Complex Inspiratory Network and the Hypoxic Ventilatory Response in Newborn Mice

2018· article· en· W3176990417 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Reklow, Megan A Hansen, Sara M. Frangos, Tucaauê S. Alvares, Gregory D. Funk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteCummings Foundation
KeywordsAdenosineHypoxia (environmental)ApneaNucleosideHypoxic ventilatory responseApnea of prematurityAnesthesiaVentilation (architecture)MedicineInhibitory postsynaptic potentialRespiratory systemPharmacologyInternal medicineChemistryBiologyBiochemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure to low oxygen (hypoxia) evokes a biphasic hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) comprising of an initial increase in ventilation followed by a secondary depression. The secondary depression is much stronger and life‐threatening in premature infants and it is implicated in apneic events (Apnea of Prematurity). Despite the clinical significance, mechanisms underlying this secondary depression are poorly understood. Recent data suggest that during hypoxia, astrocytes in the preBötzinger complex (preBötC) release ATP, which increases breathing and attenuates the secondary depression. However, ATP is rapidly metabolized into extracellular adenosine (ADO e ), which is implicated in the secondary depression. Thus, the overall effects of ATP are determined by a balance between its excitatory actions and the inhibitory actions of its by‐product, ADO. The importance of ADO is clear in that infants with apnea of prematurity are given caffeine (ADO receptor antagonist) to stimulate breathing. The ATP‐ADO balance is controlled by many factors, including equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) that move ADO across cell membranes along its concentration gradient. Our goal was to determine the role of ENTs in modulating preBötC network activity under baseline and hypoxic conditions. Bath application of the ENT‐1 inhibitor (NBMPR, 100 μM) to rhythmically‐active medullary slices from neonatal mice caused a significant 9.9±4% increase in frequency (n=5). However, when the preBötC was challenged with an ADO load (as might happen during hypoxia) via local injection of ADO (500 μM, 30 s) ENT‐1 inhibition enhanced the inhibitory effect. Similarly, when we compared the responses of wild type (WT) and ENT 1/2 knockout (ENT KO) mice to preBötC ADO injections, the duration of the frequency inhibition was almost doubled in the KO mice. We next compared the HVR of WT and ENT KO mice (1–3 days old) using whole‐body plethysmography (15 min control, 10 min 10% O 2 , 10 min recovery). Ventilation increased in both groups by 20% and gradually fell below baseline in WT mice after 4 min in hypoxia. In marked contrast, ventilation fell below baseline during the first 40 s of hypoxia in ENT KO mice by as much as 25% and never increased above baseline throughout the hypoxic challenge. These in vitro data suggest that ENTs contribute to setting ADO e tone in the preBötC under baseline conditions by transporting ADO into the extracellular space. However, under an extra load as might occur in hypoxia, ENTs become important in removing ADO e . In vivo data are consistent with this hypothesis, but it will be critical to determine whether the differences in the HVR of WT and ENT KO mice in vivo reflects loss of ENT activity in the carotid bodies or central nervous system. Support or Funding Information CIHR, NSERC, WCHRI, AIHS, CFI This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→