MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aspectos do pensamento computacional de estudantes do Ensino Fundamental

2021· article· pt· W3176996797 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Scucuglia Rodrigues da Silva, George Gadanidis, Rita de Cássia Idem, Lara Martins Barbosa, Yeda Seron Portera

Bibliographic record

VenueDebates em educação · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPsychologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta o desenvolvimento duas tarefas matemático-artístico-computacionais realizadas com um grupo de quatro estudantes de Ensino Fundamental. As tarefas exploram a temática padrões e álgebra e foram realizadas utilizando aplicativos computacionais. Os dados foram produzidos em sessões de Experimento de Ensino por meio de filmagens e realização de diário de campo. O objetivo do estudo foi identificar as habilidades do pensamento computacional emergentes do contexto supracitado. O processo de interação das estudantes com os aplicativos foi interpretado por meio de ações de aprendizagem construcionistas. Como resultado, se verificou que houve indícios da emergência das habilidades de coleta de dados, análise de dados, simulação e automação em todas as atividades e das habilidades de decomposição do problema, paralelização e abstração em atividades mais complexas. A partir do estudo realizado, se concluiu que as tarefas exploradas possibilitaram a abordagem de diversos conceitos matemáticos e computacionais, e o desenvolvimento de habilidades essenciais a processos de resolução de problemas e à própria capacidade de aprender.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDebates em educaçãoSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207