Imaging for Predicting Hemorrhagic Transformation of Acute Ischemic Stroke—A Narrative Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemorrhagic transformation is caused by extravasation of blood products from vessels after acute ischemic stroke. It is an undesirable and potentially devastating complication, which occurs in 10%-40% of clinical cases. Hemorrhagic transformation is classified into four subtypes based on European cooperative acute stroke study II. Predicting hemorrhagic complications at presentation can be useful life saving/altering decisions for the patient. Also, understanding the mechanisms of hemorrhagic transformation can lead to new treatments and intervention measures. We highlighted various imaging techniques that have been used to predict hemorrhagic transformation. Specifically, we looked at the usefulness of perfusion and permeability imaging for hemorrhagic transformation. Use of imaging to predict hemorrhagic transformation could change patient management that may lead to the prevention of hemorrhagic transformation before it occurs. We concluded that the current evidence is not strong enough to rely on these imaging parameters for predicting hemorrhagic transformation and more studies are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".