MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177079957 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2021.53012

The Ways and Methods of Ideological and Political Education for Postgraduates

2021· article· en· W3177079957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDestiny (ISS module)IdeologySociologyPoliticsCurriculumPedagogyObject (grammar)Social scienceEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the background of the Internet era, the further deepening of the Ideological and political education (IAPE) research is imminent. The community of destiny of the ideological and political curriculum is an organic body with macro structure, which is based on the fundamental principle of promoting the development of the educational theory discipline of the ideological and Political Curriculum and other members themselves, the common challenges to face, the common discourse basis, and certain value identification. This paper aims to strengthen the education of Ideological and political courses for postgraduates from the perspective of building a community of destiny of Ideological and political courses, so as to enhance the practical application of its educational theory. Starting from the concept of community, this paper analyzes in detail the concepts of community of human destiny, community of IAPE, and community of IAPE destiny; it explains the theoretical basis of constructing the community of IAPE destiny. On this basis, the IAPE of n University graduate students as the main research object, summarizes and condenses the theoretical system of students' IAPE. The full text emphasizes the effect of student assistant group on students' IAPE. Through the research of N college students' assistant group, the investigation of the actual work and the actual investigation of students, this paper summarizes the IAPE of students' assistant group in n University, and then forms a system, and puts forward relevant opinions and suggestions on the establishment of student assistant group in Colleges and Universities. Through the questionnaire survey, it is found that 89.2% of the assistant group members' dormitories have won the title of civilized dormitory, and 57.9% of the students think that the assistant group is helpful to find a job. It can be seen that the student assistant group plays a great role in the IAPE of students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.458 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it