MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Attenuation of FFA‐Induced Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance by Carnosic and Rosmarinic Acid

2019· article· en· W3177083617 on OpenAlexafffund
Danja J. Den Hartogh, Filip Valvcheski, Evangelia Tsiani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInsulin resistanceInternal medicineEndocrinologyInsulinGlucose uptakeInsulin receptorChemistrySkeletal muscleAMPKIRS1Insulin receptor substrateKinaseProtein kinase AMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impaired insulin action in muscle leads to insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, a disease on the rise. Elevated blood free fatty acids (FFAs), as seen in obesity, are associated with insulin resistance and studies have shown increased serine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS‐1) and reduced insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake in muscle cells exposed to FFA palmitate. A number of serine/threonine kinases including JNK, IKKβ, mTOR and p70 6SK have been implicated in serine phosphorylation of IRS‐1 and insulin resistance. On the other hand, activation of the energy sensor AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) increases glucose uptake and has become an important target to counteract insulin resistance. We reported recently that rosemary extract (RE) increased skeletal muscle cell glucose uptake and activated AMPK. The polyphenols carnosic acid (CA) and rosmarinic acid (RA) are found in high concentration in RE and in the present study we investigated their effect on palmitate‐induced insulin resistant L6 muscle cells. Glucose uptake was measured using [ 3 H]‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose and the signaling molecules involved were investigated by immunoblotting. Exposure of L6 myotubes to the FFA palmitate (P) (0.2 mM, 16 hours) resulted in significant reduction of insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake (I: 201±1.21% , P+I: 117±15.6% of control, P<0.001) indicating insulin resistance. Importantly, in the presence of 2 mM CA or 5 mM RA, the insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake was restored (CA+P+I: 185±7.8%, RA+P+I: 181±14.4% of control, P<0.001). Treatment with palmitate increased serine phosphorylation of IRS‐1, increased the phosphorylation/activation of JNK, mTOR and p70 6SK and significantly decreased the insulin‐stimulated phosphorylation of Akt. The effects of CA and RA on these signaling molecules are under investigation. Our data indicate that treatment with CA or RA attenuates the FFA‐induced muscle insulin resistance. These polyphenols may have potent effects against insulin resistance and deserve further study. Support or Funding Information The research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) grant to ET. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer→French-language works237,207→