MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The surreptitious survival of the opportunistic pathogen <i>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</i> within macrophages as an immune evasion strategy

2018· article· en· W3177195687 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David E. Heinrichs, Ronald S. Flannagan, David Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStaphylococcus lugdunensisMicrobiologyPhagolysosomeBiologyPhagocytosisPhagosomeInnate immune systemMacrophageLysostaphinImmune systemStaphylococcus aureusPathogenBacteriaStaphylococcusImmunologyIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staphylococcus lugdunensis has acquired recognition as a relatively new and serious pathogen that is often clinically misidentified as S. aureus . To cause infection S. lugdunensis must circumvent host immunity, including the innate defenses presented by professional phagocytes such as macrophages. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that macrophages of murine and human origin are not microbicidal towards S. lugdunensis and that phagocytosed S. lugdunensis remain viable within infected macrophages over an extended period (>24 h). Interestingly, phagocytosed S. lugdunensis, which fail to replicate, also do not intoxicate host cells, thus distinguishing the intracellular lifestyle of S. lugdunensis from that of S. aureus . Dextran pulse‐chase and LAMP‐1 immuno‐localization studies reveal that phagocytosed S. lugdunensis take up residence inside LAMP‐1‐positive phagolysosomes where the bacteria persist for at least 24 hours. Phagocytosed S. lugdunensis are modified within macrophages such that they are sensitized to in vitro stresses imposed by antimicrobial peptide treatment (e.g. polymyxin B), exposure to non‐ionic detergent (e.g. Triton‐X100), and the staphylococcal selective medium mannitol salt agar. We further demonstrate that optimal survival of S. lugdunensis requires O‐acetylated peptidoglycan since a S. lugdunensis oatA mutant, which is more sensitive to killing by lysozyme than WT, survived to a lesser extent in the phagosome. Through pharmacological disruption of lysosome function, either prior to or post phagocytosis, we demonstrate that S. lugdunensis bacteria can be coaxed into escaping the phagolysosome and replicating within both murine macrophages and primary human macrophages. Notably, however, intracellularly replicating S. lugdunensis fail to intoxicate infected macrophages as indicated by the host cells' ability to phagocytose IgG‐opsonized targets and remain refractory to vital dye staining. We propose that macrophages harboring S. lugdunensis in vivo represent a bacterial reservoir and events that disrupt macrophage function would allow these bacteria to proliferate whilst remaining protected from extracellular immune factors. Support or Funding Information Canadian Institutes of Health Research This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207