MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177284884 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v16i2.478

A Call for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Fellowship Training Programs for General Internal Medicine in Canada

2021· article· en· W3177284884 on OpenAlex
Katie Wiskar, Irene Ma, Shane Arishenkoff, Robert Arntfield

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceMedicineMedical educationHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers numerous benefits and is recognized as an important competency within Internal Medicine (IM). Despite this, a significant educational gap exists, owing in large part to a lack of expertly trained faculty and structured training opportunities. A robust POCUS training program requires not only technical excellence among faculty but also leadership with expertise in program creation and administration, quality assurance, medical education, and research. A dedicated 6- to 12-month POCUS fellowship model in programs with well-established infrastructure allows for the development of these competencies and the establishment of a network of key POCUS contacts, and prepares trainees to create or expand POCUS programs at their centers. We propose that the expansion of dedicated General IM POCUS fellowships in Canada is imperative to addressing this educational bottleneck and shaping the future leaders of Canadian IM POCUS. RésuméL’échographie au point d’intervention (POCUS) offre de nombreux avantages et est considérée comme une compétence importante en médecine interne. Pourtant, il existe une lacune importante au chapitre de la formation, attribuable en grande partie au manque d’enseignants qualifiés et d’occasions de formation structurée. Un programme de formation solide sur la POCUS exige non seulement une excellence technique parmi le corps professoral, mais aussi un leadership démontrant une expertise dans la création et l’administration de programmes, l’assurance de la qualité, l’éducation médicale et la recherche. Un modèle de formation complémentaire de 6 à 12 mois consacrée à la POCUS dans des programmes dont l’infrastructure est bien établie permet d’acquérir ces compétences et d’établir un réseau de personnes-ressources clés sur la POCUS, et prépare les personnes en cours de formation à créer ou à élargir des programmes sur la POCUS dans leur centre. Nous proposons qu’il soit impératif d’élargir les formations complémentaires sur la POCUS en médecine interne générale au Canada pour remédier à ce goulot d’étranglement en matière de formation et façonner les futurs chefs de file de la POCUS en médecine interne au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it