MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The metabolomic signature of <i>Giardia</i> sp.

2018· article· en· W3177289295 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thibault Allain, Ryan A. Groves, Ian A. Lewis, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiardiaMetabolomicsBiologyMicrobiologyGiardia lambliaContext (archaeology)MetabolomeMicrobiomeBiochemistryBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Giardia duodenalis is a protozoan parasite responsible for giardiasis, a parasitic disease characterized by intestinal malabsorption, diarrhea, weight loss and abdominal pain. The pathophysiological processes occurring during giardiasis involve epithelial abnormalities, mucus depletion and microbiota disruption, however the mechanisms are poorly understood. Upon infection, Giardia , which has a minimal biosynthetic capacity, compete locally with the commensal microbiome for nutrients and ecological niches in the duodenum. AIM In this context, we performed a metabolomic study to characterize the nutritional requirements and the secretome of several Giardia strains, isolated from human patients (assemblages A and B), outbreaks, as well as a variety of mammals. METHODS The metabolomic profiles of Giardia sp. isolates were determined using mass spectrometry. Trophozoites were grown to confluence in MTYI media and supernatants were collected at different time points (3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours) and mixed with ice cold methanol. Methanolic extracts were analyzed by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography mass spectrometry and resolved by Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column. RESULTS We identified a multitude of produced and consumed compounds such as amino acids, nucleic acid precursors, protein catabolism precursors, as well as carbohydrates and energy metabolites. Interestingly, nutrition requirements of Giardia trophozoites are significantly different between isolates, both intra and inter‐assemblages. For instance, isolate WB6 (assemblage A) is more auxotrophic for arginine than GSM strain (assemblage B), while GSM strain requires more inosine, uridine and as paragine than other isolates. CONCLUSION This study gives insight into how Giardia survives the host's intestinal tract and shows strain specific metabolomic signatures. A metabolomic approach may further help to understand the impact of nutritional modulation by Giardia trophozoites on the gut microbiome and host physiology. Support or Funding Information Grant support: University of Calgary Eyes High postdoctoral fellowship This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207