MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

cAMP‐dependent modulation of I <sub>h</sub> underlies the P2Y <sub>1</sub> receptor‐mediated excitation of the preBötzinger Complex inspiratory network in vitro

2019· article· en· W3177303448 on OpenAlexafffund
Yong Zhang, Vivian Biancardi, Ana Miranda Tapia, Toka Abu Jaib, Alexander V. Gourine, Sergey Kasparov, Gregory D. Funk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsDepolarizationLong-term potentiationHyperpolarization (physics)BiophysicsChemistryAgonistElectrophysiologyReceptorInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ventilatory response to hypoxia comprises an initial peripheral chemoreceptor‐mediated increase in ventilation followed by a centrally‐mediated secondary depression that can be life‐threatening in premature infants with apnea. ATP appears to be released from astrocytes in the preBötzinger Complex (preBötC, critical site for inspiratory rhythm generation), during hypoxia where it attenuates the secondary depression via a P2Y 1 receptor (R)‐dependent excitation of inspiratory neurons. Here we apply nerve and whole‐cell recording methods to rhythmic medullary slices (700 μM) from neonatal rat to test the hypothesis that the P2Y 1 R‐mediated excitation of the preBötC network is mediated via cAMP‐dependent modulation of the hyperpolarization‐activated inward current, I h , in inspiratory neurons. Local application of MRS2365 (P2Y 1 R agonist, 100 μM) evoked, in a subpopulation of inspiratory neurons (~33%), inward currents that reversed between −40 and −60 mV, consistent with activation of I h . MRS2365 also potentiated the sag current, characteristic of I h , that was progressively activated with hyperpolarizing voltage pulses from −50 to −110 mV (10 mV increments; 32 ± 6% potentiation measured at −100 mV). Comparison of I h activation curves, produced via analysis of tail currents evoked by a series of 10 mV hyperpolarizing steps from −50 mV to −140 mV, in control and MRS2365, revealed a 6.6 mV, MRS2365‐induced depolarizing shift in V 1/2 (V m at which 50% of HCN channels are open). The MRS2365 inward current and its potentiation of I h were blocked by local pre‐application of ZD 7288 (open channel blocker of I h , 100 μM). At the network level, pre‐application of ZD 7288 at 100 μM and 25 μM attenuated the MRS2365‐induced frequency increase in inspiratory‐related activity by 94 ± 3% and 70 ± 12%, respectively. 15‐min intracellular dialysis of SQ 22536 (adenylyl cyclase inhibitor, 100 μM) from the whole‐cell pipette significantly attenuated the MRS2365 currents by 60 ± 4%. Similarly, SQ 22536 (1 mM and 100 μM for local and bath application respectively) attenuated the MRS2365‐induced frequency increase by 67 ± 8%. These data suggest that the P2Y 1 R‐mediated excitation of the preBötC network is produced, at least in part, via a cAMP‐dependent modulation of I h in a subpopulation of inspiratory neurons. Support or Funding Information CIHR, AIHS, NSERC, CFI, and WCHRI This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→