MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Age dependent cardiovascular responses to angiotensin II (ANG II) in conscious mice

2012· article· en· W3177382875 on OpenAlexaff
Wentao Qi, El-Sayed SB Gera, Francine G. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiotensin IIMean arterial pressureBlood pressureInternal medicineEndocrinologyHomeostasisVasodilationReceptorRenin–angiotensin systemHeart rateMedicineVascular resistanceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ANG II plays a critical role in regulating cardiovascular homeostasis. By binding to type 1 receptors, ANG II increases vascular resistance and thereby arterial pressure. The expression of type II receptors, which promote vasodilatation, is upregulated in the post natal period and may result in different cardiovascular responses to ANG II early in life. This study was designed to evaluate cardiovascular responses to ANG II in two groups of conscious mice (Group I: 4 weeks, n=5; Group II: 10–14 weeks, n=8). Experiments consisted of measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) for 20 min before (Control, C) and 30 min after I.V. infusion of one of seven doses of ANG II (0–10 ng/g/min). ANG II was associated with a dose‐dependent increase in MAP in both groups reaching a maximum at 5.0 ng/g/min (EC 100 ) in group I (C 99±11; Max 126±16 mmHg) and 0.5 ng/g/min (EC 100 ) in group II (C 113±9, Max 139±22 mmHg). The time to peak was longer and the duration of the MAP response was less in group I as compared to group II. In group I, in response to EC 100 , HR was decreased from 563±103 (C) to 467±62 bpm, yet remained unchanged in group II from 503±87 bpm (C). These results provide evidence that the cardiovascular responses to acute ANG II infusion in young mice are developmentally regulated. Mechanisms underlying these age‐dependent differences are not yet clear but could reflect developmental regulation of ANG II receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→