MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3177405139 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a231

Antioxidant N‐acetylcysteine restores myocardial Mn‐SOD activity and attenuates left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in diabetic rats

2006· article· en· W3177405139 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zhengyuan Xia, Zhixin Guo, Violet G. Yuen, Jihong Jiang, John H. McNeill

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntioxidantMedicineDiastoleCardiologyInternal medicineAcetylcysteineChemistryBlood pressureBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manganese‐containing superoxide dismutase (Mn‐SOD) plays a critical role in guarding against mitochondrial oxidative stress (OS). Abnormal myocardial mitochondrial metabolism of reactive oxygen species plays an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiac dysfunction. We hypothesized that chronic treatment with N‐acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant, would normalize hyperglycemia induced inactivation of Mn‐SOD and attenuate myocardial dysfunction. Control and streptozotozin‐induced diabetic rats were treated (CT, DT) or untreated (C, D) with NAC in drinking water for 8 weeks. Myocardial Mn‐SOD activity, but not Mn‐SOD protein expression, in D rats was significantly reduced while levels of OS as determined by myocardial free 15‐F2t‐isoprostane was increased as compared to all other groups. This was accompanied by increased membrane translocation of p67phox, a cytosolic subunit of the NAD(P)H oxidase whose activation may contribute to the elevated OS in diabetes. A decrease in left ventricular maximum relaxation (‐dP/dT) and an increase in the t1/2 to maximum relaxation were found in D rats. NAC normalized or attenuated the changes seen in D group. The results suggest that OS‐mediated inactivation of myocardial Mn‐SOD may contribute to the development of myocardial diastolic dysfunction in diabetes. This study was funded by GIA from Canadian Diabetes Association and a Program Grant from the Heart & Stroke Foundation of BC and Yukon, Canada. ZX and JJ are supported by CIHR/Rx &D HRF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→