MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Orexin Receptor‐1 Inactivation Facilitates Lung Motor Activity during In Vitro Hypercapnic Stimulation of Pre‐metamorphic Bullfrogs

2019· article· en· W3177405294 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tara A. Janes, Elisa M. Fonseca, Stéphanie Fournier, Luciane H. Gargaglioni, Richard Kinkead

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHypercapniaBiologyBullfrogEndocrinologyInternal medicineBrainstemRespiratory systemControl of respirationStimulationAnatomyNeuroscienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms regulating amphibian respiration change dramatically during development as the animal transitions from aquatic to aerial breathing. Gill ventilation is the primary mechanism for oxygen acquisition in early stages, but infrequent lung breaths also occur. Interestingly, activating central chemoreceptive pathways (i.e. hypercapnia, hypoxia) can stimulate lung motor activity in tadpoles. Yet, the mechanisms which modulate chemosensitivity at various stages of development remain poorly understood in amphibians. Orexin is a critical hypothalamic neurotransmitter that is highly conserved across vertebrates and regulates important functions including sleep‐wake states, feeding, and breathing. In many vertebrates, orexinergic neurons are profoundly excited by increased CO 2 (and decreased pH), suggesting that they are intrinsically chemosensitive. We hypothesized that antagonism of the orexin receptor‐1 (OX 1 R) would blunt the increased ventilatory response to hypercapnia in pre‐metamorphic tadpoles of the American bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus ). Using tadpole brainstem preparations (Taylor‐Kollros stages: IV–XII), we determined the effects of hypercapnia alone (5% CO 2 , 20 mins), or in the presence of an OX 1 R antagonist (SB‐334867, 10μM) on respiratory motor activity recorded from cranial nerves V, VII and X. Isolated brainstems were transected rostral to the optic nerve to maintain an intact hypothalamus. Contrary to previous reports performed on preparations without the hypothalamus, our data showed no significant effect of hypercapnia on the frequency of lung bursting in this stage group. However, blocking OX 1 R's during hypercapnia revealed a significant ventilatory response observable as an increase in lung burst frequency (baseline respiratory motor activity was not affected by SB‐334867). Although these results were contrary to our hypothesis, they demonstrate that orexin inhibits the central CO 2 chemoreflex of pre‐metamorphic bullfrog tadpoles. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by the Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program and Fonds de Recherche de Quebec ‐ Nature et Technologies awarded to E. Fonseca. Additional support was provided by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec ‐ Santé (FRQS) for T. Janes and an NSERC Discovery Grant awarded to R. Kinkead. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→