A zonally-oriented teleconnection pattern induced by heating of the western Tibetan Plateau in boreal summer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The thermal effect of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) on the northern hemisphere climate has long been a hot topic of scientific research. However, the global effects of the TP heat source are still unclear. We investigate the teleconnection patterns coincident with the TP heat source in boreal summer using both observational data and numerical models including a linearized baroclinic model and an atmospheric general circulation model. The western TP shows the most intense variability in atmospheric heating and the most active connection to atmospheric circulations. The surface sensible heating component of the western TP heat source is associated with a high-latitude wave train propagating from North Japan to central North America through the Bering Sea and Canada. The radiative heating component is accompanied by a wavenumber-4 wave train over Eurasia. We focus on the global zonally-oriented pattern that is connected with the latent heat release from the western TP, referred to here as the TP–circumglobal teleconnection (TP-CGT). The TP-CGT pattern is triggered by the western TP latent heating in two parts starting from the TP: an eastward-propagating wave train trapped in the westerly jet stream and a westward Rossby wave response. The TP-CGT accounts for above 18% of the total variance of the circumglobal teleconnection pattern and modulates mid-latitude precipitation by superimposition. The western TP is the key region in which diabatic heating can initiate the two atmospheric responses concurrently, and the heating over northeastern Asia or the Indian Peninsula is unable to induce the circumglobal pattern directly. The unique geographical location and strong tropospheric heating also make the western TP as a “transit area” of transferring the indirect impact of the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) to the TP-CGT. These results enhance our understanding of the relationship between the circumglobal teleconnection and the ISM and is helpful for improving the prediction of the circumglobal teleconnection variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".