MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177435831 · doi:10.1113/jp281293

Functional reserve and sex differences during exercise to exhaustion revealed by post‐exercise ischaemia and repeated supramaximal exercise

2021· article· en· W3177435831 on OpenAlexaff
Marcos Martín-Rincón, Miriam Gelabert‐Rebato, Mario Perez‐Valera, Víctor Galván-Álvarez, David Morales‐Álamo, Cecilia Dorado, Robert Boushel, Jostein Hallén, José A. L. Calbet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la InformaciónUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessIsometric exerciseMedicineVO2 maxPhysical exerciseCardiologyExercise physiologyInternal medicineRepeated measures designPhysical therapyHeart ratePhysical medicine and rehabilitationBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points Females have lower fatigability than males during single limb isometric and dynamic contractions, but whether sex‐differences exist during high‐intensity whole‐body exercise remains unknown. This study shows that males and females respond similarly to repeated supramaximal whole‐body exercise, and that at task failure a large functional reserve remains in both sexes. Using post‐exercise ischaemia with repeated exercise, we have shown that this functional reserve depends on the glycolytic component of substrate‐level phosphorylation and is almost identical in both sexes. Metaboreflex activation during post‐exercise ischaemia and the O 2 debt per kg of active lean mass are also similar in males and females after supramaximal exercise. Females have a greater capacity to extract oxygen during repeated supramaximal exercise and reach lower , experiencing a larger drop in brain oxygenation than males, without apparent negative repercussion on performance. Females had no faster recovery of performance after accounting for sex differences in lean mass. Abstract The purpose of this study was to ascertain what mechanisms explain sex differences at task failure and to determine whether males and females have a functional reserve at exhaustion. Exercise performance, cardiorespiratory variables, oxygen deficit, and brain and muscle oxygenation were determined in 18 males and 18 females (21–36 years old) in two sessions consisting of three bouts of constant‐power exercise at 120% of until exhaustion interspaced by 20 s recovery periods. In one of the two sessions, the circulation of both legs was occluded instantaneously (300 mmHg) during the recovery periods. Females had a higher muscle O 2 extraction during fatiguing supramaximal exercise than males. Metaboreflex activation, and lean mass‐adjusted O 2 deficit and debt were similar in males and females. Compared to males, females reached lower and brain oxygenation during supramaximal exercise, without apparent negative consequences on performance. After the occlusions, males and females were able to restart exercising at 120% of , revealing a similar functional reserve, which depends on glycolytic component of substrate‐level phosphorylation and its rate of utilization. After ischaemia, muscle O 2 extraction was increased, and muscle was similarly reduced in males and females. The physiological response to repeated supramaximal exercise to exhaustion is remarkably similar in males and females when differences in lean mass are considered. Both sexes fatigue with a large functional reserve, which depends on the glycolytic energy supply, yet females have higher oxygen extraction capacity, but reduced and brain oxygenation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207