Several <i>Pythium</i> species cause crown and root rot on cannabis (<i>Cannabis sativa</i> L., marijuana) plants grown under commercial greenhouse conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cannabis (Cannabis sativa L., marijuana) plants with symptoms of crown rot, root decay, wilting and plant death were sampled during 2018 and 2019 from seven licensed production greenhouses. Affected tissues from 140 diseased plants were surface-sterilized and plated onto potato dextrose agar. Ninety-five isolates morphologically resembling Pythium species were subcultured and subjected to PCR of the ITS1-5.8-ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA. The following species were identified based on >99% sequence identity to reference isolates in GenBank: P. myriotylum (43 isolates), P. dissotocum (35 isolates), P. aphanidermatum (3 isolates) and Globisporangium ultimum (syn. P. ultimum) (2 isolates). A fifth species – P. catenulatum (12 isolates), was distinguished from P. rhizo-oryzae using the cytochrome oxidase c subunit I (COI) sequence. Cannabis licensed production facilities in British Columbia had all five species present, while P. dissotocum was found in two facilities in Ontario, and P. myriotylum was present in one facility in northern California. Isolates selected to represent each Pythium species were grown on potato dextrose agar at 25°C and they all showed comparable colony growth after 6 days. The same isolates caused root browning, decay and stunting of cannabis plants grown in a coco: perlite potting medium. Plant mortality was similar after 21 days but rates of disease progression varied depending on the isolate tested. Wounding of roots and prolonged periods of saturation enhanced disease development. These results demonstrate for the first time that crown and root rot on greenhouse-grown cannabis plants can be caused by up to five Pythium species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".