MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177689207 · doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuab020.158

Palliative care in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs): Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry

2021· article· en· W3177689207 on OpenAlexaffabout
Antônio Fagundes, DD Berg, EA Bohula, VM Baird-Zars, Jianping Guo, J.N. Katz, C A Alviar, Sean van Diepen, Morrow Da

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalliative careAdvance care planningCardiogenic shockEmergency medicineEnd-of-life careIntensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry Introduction Palliative care is a practice focused on providing relief of symptoms of illness, while optimizing the quality of life for patients and families. We aimed to quantify palliative care (PC) practices and end-of-life decision-making in critically ill cardiac patients in contemporary CICUs. Methods The CCCTN Registry is a network of tertiary care CICUs in the United States and Canada. Between 2017 and 2020, up to 26 centers contributed an annual 2-month snapshot of all consecutive admissions to the CICU. We captured code status, rates of palliative care consultation, and decisions for comfort measures only (CMO) before all deaths in the CICU. Results Of 8231 admissions, 10% ended with death in the CICU and 2.6% were discharges to hospice. Of deceased patients, 68% were CMO before death. The median age of CMO patients was 70y (25th-75th: 59-78) vs. 67 (56-77) among deaths without CMO. In the CMO group, only 13% were DNR/DNI at admission, and the remainder were full code. Respiratory insufficiency and non-cardiogenic shock were the CICU indications most frequently associated with CMO. The median time from CICU admission to CMO decision was 3.4 days (25th-75th: 1.2-7.7) and was ≥7 days in 27% (Figure). Time from CMO decision to death was <24h in 88%, with a median of 3.8h (25th-75th 1.0-10.3). Before a CMO decision, 73% received mechanical ventilation and 25% mechanical circulatory support. Of total deaths, 34% of intubated patients were palliatively extubated. Formal PC services were engaged in only 28% of deaths. Conclusions In contemporary CICUs, CMO preceded death in 2/3 of cases. The high use of advanced ICU therapies, lengthy times to a CMO decision, and the very short time from CMO to death, highlight a potential opportunity for greater PC consultation, as well as training programs to build skills in PC for practitioners in the CICU. Abstract Figure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.096
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.096
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular CareSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207