MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177699750 · doi:10.22323/1.395.0945

VERITAS follow-up observation of the blazar TXS 0506+056

2021· article· en· W3177699750 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterOffice of ScienceCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBlazarNeutrinoFlux (metallurgy)Event (particle physics)ObservatoryHigh energyGamma rayCosmic ray

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gamma-ray blazar TXS 0506+056 was found with an enhanced gamma-ray emission statein spatial and temporal coincidence with the IceCube high energy neutrino event IC170922A.This is the most significant association by far between a high-energy neutrino event and a blazarin a flaring state. Studying the time evolution and spectral behavior of the blazar emission mayhelp in identifying the sources of the diffuse neutrino flux observed by IceCube and the origin ofenergetic cosmic rays. TXS 0506+056 was detected by the VERITAS gamma-ray observatory witha significance of 5.8 standard deviations above 110 GeV in a 35 hour data set collected betweenSeptember 23, 2017 and February 6, 2018. Here we will present results from recent VERITASobservations and an associated multiwavelength campaign, collected between October 10, 2018to March 1, 2021. A relatively quiet very high energy gamma-ray emission state was observedduring this time period, and flux upper limits are used to constrain the potential variability of thisblazar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207