Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ahmedi, who was born in the middle of the second quarter of the 14th century and died in the middle of the first quarter of the 15th century, has a very important place in terms of being the founder of the Divan Literature and Divan Literature Tradition and a bridge poet in terms of Anatolian Turkish. Although he lived a bumpy life and traveled many cities both for his education and during his poetry life after his education, he became a pioneer in the fields of poetry, usage of prosody and the creation of concept. Ahmedi, who managed to stand out not only with his poetry but also with his historian, physician, bureaucrat and scholar identities, is a sophisticated person who is respected wherever he goes. In accordance with his importance, the works he wrote have been circulated many times in his own period and afterwards; and today hundreds of studies have been made about him as a very frequent subject of old literature studies. With the advancement of today's technology, the follow-up of these studies has become very difficult; For this reason, bibliography studies have gained importance. Accordingly, the bibliographies of great poets such as Fuzuli, Bâki, Nâbi, Seyh Gâlib were listed and published before. In this study, a bibliography of Ahmedi, who is known as the founding poet of Divan poetry and considered as one of the greatest poets, has been prepared. The main subject of this study is the theses, books, articles, declarations, encyclopedias and lexicon articles, and publications in foreign languages, starting from the manuscripts of Ahmedi's works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".