Factors related to the recovery of functional capacity in women with breast cancer: systematic review (Factores relacionados con la recuperación de la capacidad funcional en mujeres con cáncer de mama: revisión sistemática)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this review was to consolidate the available evidence about the factors related to the recovery of functional capacity (FC) in women with breast cancer, based the PRISMA declaration criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed using the New Castle Ottawa and JADAD scales. 11 studies were included: seven experimental and four cohort follow-ups. Psychological, clinical, and treatment factors related to FC recovery, were identified. However, some results come from studies with low methodological quality. Additionally, the findings are not comparable because they were evaluated using different instruments. In conclusion, the recovery of FC to require considering individual and interventions factors, as psychological well-being and early rehabilitation. Is necessary to standardize the instruments to evaluate FC in women with breast cancer, and to increase the quality of the research about this topic. === El objetivo de esta revisión fue consolidar la evidencia disponible sobre los factores relacionados con la recuperación de la capacidad funcional (CF) en mujeres con cáncer de mama de acuerdo a los criterios de la declaración de PRISMA. La calidad de los estudios se evaluó utilizando las escalas New Castle Ottawa y JADAD. Se incluyeron 11 estudios: 7 experimentales y 4 seguimientos de cohortes. Identificamos factores psicológicos, clínicos y de tratamiento relacionados con la recuperación de CF, sin embargo, algunos resultados provienen de estudios con baja calidad metodológica. Además, los resultados no son comparables, porque fueron evaluados utilizando diferentes instrumentos. En conclusión, la recuperación de la FC requiere considerar factores individuales y de intervención, como el bienestar psicológico y la rehabilitación temprana, pero es necesario estandarizar los instrumentos para evaluar la CF en mujeres con cáncer de mama y aumentar la calidad de la investigación sobre este tema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".