Tectonic Growth of the Late Paleozoic‐Middle Mesozoic Northwestern Margin of Laurentia and Implications for the Farewell Terrane: Stratigraphic, Structural, and Provenance Records From the Central Alaska Range
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Analysis of upper Paleozoic‐Jurassic strata in the central Alaska Range provides new insights into the following: the configuration of Late Triassic‐Jurassic depocenters along the northwestern Laurentian margin, the late Paleozoic paleogeographic position of the Farewell terrane, and the timing of accretion of the Farewell terrane to the Laurentian margin. Results from geologic mapping, stratigraphic analysis, and U‐Pb detrital zircon geochronology document two juxtaposed Paleozoic‐Jurassic stratigraphic assemblages. The Southern package consists of Permian‐Middle Triassic submarine fan strata and Upper Triassic pillow basalts that can be correlated with the Farewell terrane of the western Alaska Range. This package yields Ordovician‐Silurian and Late Pennsylvanian‐Early Permian detrital zircons linked to the Alexander and Wrangellia terranes. This detrital connection suggests that the Farewell terrane most likely collided with the Insular terranes in the paleo‐Pacific basin during the late Paleozoic. The Northern package, in contrast, consists of Upper Triassic‐Jurassic submarine fan strata deposited along the northwestern margin of Laurentia. An abundance of Neoproterozoic and early Paleozoic detrital zircons suggests recycling of Caledonian and Baltican zircons from the Ellesmerian clastic wedge of northwestern Canada. An influx of Late Triassic‐Early Jurassic detrital zircons in Upper Jurassic strata of the Northern package records the development of Mesozoic arc magmatism along the continental margin. Our findings document deformation consistent with latest Jurassic‐earliest Cretaceous accretion of the Farewell terrane to the Laurentian margin. Our results also suggest that the Farewell terrane may underlie much of the central Alaska Range, and played an important role in the construction of the northern Cordillera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".