Los servicios profesionales en América del Norte. Un análisis de sus resultados y perspectivas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo presenta las caracteristicas actuales del mercado laboral en America del Norte, para ello se toma como marco de referencia el Tratado de Libre Comercio de America del Norte (TLCAN). Asimismo, se analizan los resultados actuales y las perspectivas futuras de la prestacion de servicios profesionales entre Canada, Estados Unidos y Mexico; los servicios profesionales mas demandados; los requisitos para su prestacion; asi como las oportunidades de acceso y restricciones para los profesionistas mexicanos interesados en incorporarse. El argumento central es que uno de los sectores mas dinamicos en la generacion de empleo es el de servicios, y que este a su vez presenta prioridades y particularidades entre los tres paises. Por otra parte, no podemos soslayar que hay un aumento de la migracion de mexicanos altamente calificados en relacion con anos anteriores. No obstante, una mayor movilidad de profesionistas en el mercado laboral de America del Norte sigue siendo un reto para Mexico, pese a las negociaciones existentes, y mas bien se ha caracterizado por cubrir las necesidades estrategicas de la economia de la region, donde tambien repercute la politica migratoria de cada pais. Finalmente, a manera de reflexion, se presentan los resultados indirectos de la migracion de profesionales, como la fuga de cerebros
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".