Longitudinal changes in the control mechanisms for blood pressure and cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: Secondary results of a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are key mechanisms involved in the homeostasis of blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow. We assessed changes in these mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease (AD) during a 1.5 year follow-up. In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial we measured beat-to-beat BP, heart rate, and cerebral blood flow velocity at baseline, 0.5 and 1.5 years, during: rest (spontaneous oscillations), repeated sit-stand maneuvers (induced oscillations), an orthostatic challenge, and hypo- and hypercapnia. dCA was estimated using transfer function analysis and the autoregulatory index on spontaneous and induced oscillations. BRS was estimated by calculating the heart rate response to BP changes during induced oscillations. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes over time. 56 patients were included (mean age:73 ± 6 years, 57% female). BRS did not change over time. dCA parameters showed small changes after 0.5 years, suggestive of a reduction in efficiency (e.g. higher gain [linear mixed effect model: B = 0.09, SE = 0.03, P = 0.008] and lower phase [B = -9.7, SE= 3.2, P = 0.004] in the very low frequency domain, and lower autoregulatory index during induced oscillations [B = -0.69, SE = 0.26, P = 0.010]). These changes did not show further progression after 1.5 years of follow-up. In this sample of patients with dementia due to AD we found no evidence that dCA or BRS become impaired during AD progression. This paves the way for further studies that investigate the safety and benefits of antihypertensive treatment in patients with AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".