MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact Of Covid-19 Stay-at-home Restrictions And Employment Changes On Physical Activity And Sedentary Behavior Changes

2021· article· en· W3178134417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Riley J. Corrigan, Angela R. Hillman, Paul Chase, Fernanda Rocha de Faria, Zoe Johanna, Cheryl A. Howe

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)RecreationPhysical activityMedicinePandemicWork hoursAnalysis of varianceGerontologyWork (physics)Physical therapyPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perceived barriers are associated with decreased moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). COVID-19 pandemic restrictions may strengthen these barriers, causing a decrease in MVPA and increase in sedentary behavior (SB) across United States and Canada. PURPOSE: This study compared self-reported work-, recreation-, and travel-related MVPA and SB prior to and during COVID-19 “stay at home” restrictions across North America. METHODS: The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was distributed via email and social media from April 21 to May 9, 2020. One- and two-way ANOVAs were used to compare data overall and by group (country, age, sex, race, income and education). RESULTS: After removing incomplete/invalid surveys, 1,336 responses (1,228 from USA, 991 females, 1,187 Caucasian, 634 between 18-29 y) were analyzed. As a result of pandemic restrictions, 51.4% (n = 687) of the sample shifted to work from home and 12.1% (n = 162) lost their job. Overall, during COVID restrictions, 8.3% (n = 110) fewer reported work-related MVPA with a reduction of 178.6 ± 20.9 min/wk (range: -67.6 ± 32.2 min/wk in those with no change in employment to -611.0 ± 91.3 min/wk in those who lost their job). Canada reported less of a decrease in work-related MVPA (-109.4 ± 47.3 min/week; adj. p = 0.08) compared to United States (-184.6 ± 22.4; adj. p < 0.0001). Similarly, 28.0% (n = 374) fewer reported travel-related MVPA, with more of a decrease in females and younger age groups, and no difference across employment change. While 7.3% (n = 98) fewer reported recreational MVPA, there was no significant decrease (-30.4 ± 11.5 min/wk) in reported time overall and in all group comparisons. There was a significant increase in time spent in SB (watching TV and sitting; +94.9 ± 4.1 min/wk) in all groups, except the oldest age group (70+ y). There was no change in PA mode, with locomotive and fitness classes as the predominant mode at both timepoints. Of the 68% (n = 709) participants who reported using PA facilities (gyms, clubs, etc.), 31.3% (n = 418) stated they would not return, with “being unsafe” as the most predominant reason. CONCLUSIONS: As hypothesized, pandemic restrictions had a negative impact on PA and SB in both Canada and United States. More research is needed to examine the impact of these pandemic restrictions long-term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicPhysical Activity and Health→French-language works237,207→