Usage of Prosody Modification and Acoustic Adaptation for Robust Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of the automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are trained using adult speech due to the less availability of the children's speech dataset. The speech recognition rate of such systems is very less when tested using the children's speech, due to the presence of the inter-speaker acoustic variabilities between the adults and children's speech. These inter-speaker acoustic variabilities are mainly because of the higher pitch and lower speaking rate of the children. Thus, the main objective of the research work is to increase the speech recognition rate of the Punjabi-ASR system by reducing these inter-speaker acoustic variabilities with the help of prosody modification and speaker adaptive training. The pitch period and duration (speaking rate) of the speech signal can be altered with prosody modification without influencing the naturalness, message of the signal and helps to overcome the acoustic variations present in the adult's and children's speech. The developed Punjabi-ASR system is trained with the help of adult speech and prosody-modified adult speech. This prosody modified speech overcomes the massive need for children's speech for training the ASR system and improves the recognition rate. Results show that prosody modification and speaker adaptive training helps to minimize the word error rate (WER) of the Punjabi-ASR system to 8.79% when tested using children's speech.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it