Mechanistic Study of Metal–Ligand Cooperativity in Mn(II)-Catalyzed Hydroborations: Hemilabile SNS Ligand Enables Metal Hydride-Free Reaction Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A combined experimental and mechanistic study of the chemoselective hydroboration of carbonyls by the paramagnetic bis-amido Mn[SMeNSMe]2 complex (1) is described. The catalyst allows for room-temperature hydroboration of carbonyls at low catalyst loadings (0.1 mol %) and reaction times (<30 min). A series of mechanistic studies highlight the significance of bifunctional amido bis(thioether) ligand L to the success of the reaction, insight otherwise difficult to attain in paramagnetic systems. Kinetic studies using variable time normalization analysis revealed no unusual reaction kinetics, indicating the absence of side reactions. A borylated analogue of L was observed and characterized via mass spectrometry. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations showed that thioether hemilability of L is crucial during catalysis for providing the active coordinating site. Also, the frequently proposed Mn–H intermediate was found not to be the active species responsible for catalysis. Instead, an inner-sphere reaction pathway with carbonyl coordination to the metal center and amido-promoted B–H reactivity is proposed to be operative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".