Comprehensive Multiphase NMR Probehead with Reduced Radiofrequency Heating Improves the Analysis of Living Organisms and Heat-Sensitive Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comprehensive multiphase (CMP) NMR, first described in 2012, combines all of the hardware components necessary to analyze all phases (solid, gel, and solution) in samples in their natural state. In combination with spectral editing experiments, it can fully differentiate phases and study the transfer of chemical species across and between phases, providing unprecedented molecular-level information in unaltered natural systems. However, many natural samples, such as swollen soils, plants, and small organisms, contain water, salts, and ionic compounds, making them electrically lossy and susceptible to RF heating, especially when using high-strength RF fields required to select the solid domains. While dedicated reduced-heating probes have been developed for solid-state NMR, to date, all CMP-NMR probes have been based on solenoid designs, which can lead to problematic sample heating. Here, a new prototype CMP probe was developed, incorporating a loop gap resonator (LGR) for decoupling. Temperature increases are monitored in salt solutions analogous to those in small aquatic organisms and then tested in vivo on Hyalella azteca (freshwater shrimp). In the standard CMP probe (solenoid), 80% of organisms died within 4 h under high-power decoupling, while in the LGR design, all organisms survived the entire test period of 12 h. The LGR design reduced heating by a factor of ∼3, which allowed 100 kHz decoupling to be applied to salty samples with generally ≤10 °C sample heating. In addition to expanding the potential for in vivo research, the ability to apply uncompromised high-power decoupling could be beneficial for multiphase samples containing true crystalline solids that require the strongest possible decoupling fields for optimal detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".