MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178938298 · doi:10.1002/plr2.20131

Registration of durum wheat germplasm A0709‐BX05 with resistance to ergot

2021· article· en· W3178938298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Registrations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHoneydewGermplasmAgronomyTriticum turgidumResistance (ecology)Genetic resourcesBiotechnologyPoaceaeHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A0709‐BX05 (Reg. no. GP‐1060, PI 698311) is a Canada western amber durum (CWAD) derived durum wheat [ Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn.] line developed at the Swift Current Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada. A0709‐BX05 was selected by a modified pedigree breeding procedure from the single cross of A0262&AM050/‘Strongfield’ made in 2007. A0709‐BX05 was evaluated for ergot resistance based on the honeydew and sclerotial production on spikes in greenhouse testing from 2012 to 2018. A0709‐BX05 expresses a highly resistant response to ergot, with rare to no honeydew and very few to no sclerotia formed on the spike after inoculation, far superior to checks Strongfield, ‘AC Navigator’, and ‘AC Melita’ and better than ‘Eurostar’. A0709‐BX05 has a good package of agronomic, disease, and end‐use quality traits for the CWAD wheat class combined with the ergot resistance. The release of A0709‐BX05 will accelerate the deployment of ergot resistance in durum wheat breeding and genetic and genomic studies related to ergot resistance in durum wheat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it