MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pure R<sup>2</sup> gravity can gravitate about a flat background

2021· article· en· W3179200020 on OpenAlexaff
Ariel Edery

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCosmological constantConformal gravityMinkowski spaceMathematical physicsDe Sitter universeGravitonDe Sitter spaceMassive gravityGravitationSpacetimeLinearized gravityEinsteinClassical mechanicsConformal symmetryConformal mapUniverseQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pure R 2 gravity (R 2 gravity by itself with no Einstein-Hilbert term) has attracted attention because it is different from other quadratic gravity theories. In a curved de Sitter (dS) or anti-de Sitter (AdS) background, it is equivalent to Einstein gravity with an additional massless scalar and with a cosmological constant. In contrast to other higher-derivative theories, it is therefore unitary. The equivalence with Einstein gravity is not valid for a flat background. In fact, it has been shown that linearizations of pure R 2 gravity about flat spacetime does not produce a graviton. In other words, it does not gravitate about flat space. Pure R 2 gravity is invariant under restricted Weyl transformations where the metric is scaled by a conformal factor that obeys a harmonic condition. In this work we consider an action composed of pure R 2 gravity, a massless scalar field φ non-minimally coupled to gravity plus other terms. The entire action is invariant under restricted Weyl transformations. We show that when the scalar field φ acquires a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV), flat spacetime now becomes a viable gravitating background solution. The restricted Weyl symmetry becomes broken, not explicitly but spontaneously. In other words, when φ acquires a non-zero VEV, the equivalent Einstein action has now the possibility of having a zero cosmological constant and therefore solutions in a Minkowski background. The action can also have, as before, a non-zero cosmological constant, so that solutions in a dS and AdS background are still possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207