MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179226227 · doi:10.3390/analytica2030007

Determination of Clobazam and Its Major Metabolite N-desmethylclobazam in Human Plasma with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

2021· article· en· W3179226227 on OpenAlexafffund
Fadumo Ahmed Isse, Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytica—A Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Analysis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta
KeywordsMetaboliteChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChemistryActive metabolitePharmacokineticsClobazamAnalyteCoefficient of variationDichloromethaneHuman plasmaPharmacologyEpilepsyMedicineBiochemistrySolvent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clobazam (CLB) is a benzodiazepine that is used in many types of epilepsy. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CLB is not routine, there is evidence that TDM may be of value in conditions where pharmacokinetic alterations are suspected. Therefore, determination of both CLB and its active metabolite concentrations is essential for TDM. Herein, we present a simple and practical method for determination of CLB and N-desmethylclobazam (NDMCLB) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The drugs were extracted by hexane:dichloromethane (1:1, v/v) from 0.3 mL plasma. The separation was carried out with a C18 reverse phase column using a mobile phase of water:acetonitrile (57:43, v/v) pumped at 0.8 mL/min. The analytes were detected at 228 nm. The method was linear over the concentration range 20–500 ng/mL for CLB and 200–3000 ng/mL for NDMCLB. The intra-day coefficient of variation (CV) was <10% for CLB and <6% for NDMCLB, while the inter-day CV for CLB was <16%. The metabolite inter-day CV was <6%. The accuracy of intra- and inter-day assessments determined for CLB and NDMCLB was within ±10%. This paper describes a rapid, reliable, and simple method for measuring CLB and its metabolite NDMCLB in human plasma. This UV-HPLC procedure offers acceptable precision and accuracy to quantify CLB and its metabolite in human plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytica—A Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical AnalysisSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207