Analisis Pengaruh Psikologis Konsumen Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Smartphone OPPO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Analisis Pengaruh Psikologis Konsumen Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Smartphone Oppo (Studi Kasus Di Toko Handoko Cell Karanganyar). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pengambilan data secara primer yaitu menyebar kuesioner dimana populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah pengguna/ konsumen Smartphone Oppo di Toko Handoko Cell Karanganyar. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teknik simple random sampling dengan jumlah populasi sebanyak 502 dan diambil sampel 100 responden. Dari hasil pengujian validitas dan reliabilitas data menunjukkan bahwa seluruh item pertanyaan yang diajukan terbukti valid dan reliabel. Hasil persamaan regresi linier berganda variabel motivasi pembelian, persepsi kualitas dan sikap terhadap merek, berpengaruh positif terhadap keputusan pembelian, Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa variabel motivasi pembelian, persepsi kualitas dan sikap terhadap merek secara parsial berbengaruh signifikan terhadap keputusan pembelian . Hasil uji F menunjukkan variabel motivasi pembelian, persepsi kualitas dan sikap terhadap merek secara simultan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keputusan pembelian. Hasil koefisien determinasi (R 2) menunjukkan bahwa nilai Adjusted R square sebesar 0,663yang berarti keputusan pembelian Smartphone Oppo mampu dijelaskan dengan variabel motivasi pembelian, persepsi kualitas dan sikap terhadap merek sebesar 66,3% dan sisanya 33,7% dijelaskan oleh variabel lain diluar penelitian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".