O LÉXICO DA VIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A MULHER EM MANUSCRITO HISTÓRICO DO SÉCULO XVIII: CONSIDERAÇÕES LEXICOGRÁFICAS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a study of lexical units related to the lexical field of violence against women, from theanalysis of the semidiplomatic edition of the 18th century Application of the Overseas Historical Archive,related to Bahia, which was catalogued by the Resgaste Barão do Rio Branco Project, in 2019. Based onthe theoretical basis of Gonçalves (2017; 2020abc), Barbosa (1990; 2001), Welker (2004) and Abbade(2006) and from the philological exercise of editing in articulation with the lexicographic and lexicologicalstudy, 15 lexical units were listed and analyzed in this historical document, considering the definitionsrecorded in three lexicographical works, in their respective electronic versions: Bluteau (1712-1728),Vieira (1871-1874) and Moraes Silva (1813). By analyzing the lexical repertoire of the aforementioneddocument, it is possible to perceive social and ideological issues, which make us reflect on the cultural anddiscursive practices of gender violence in Portuguese American colonial society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it