MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179367200

A fluid inclusion study of the Little Nahanni LCT-Type Pegmatite Group, NWT Canada: implications for the nature and origin of fluids in LCT-Type Pegmatites and Pegmatite evolution

2019· dissertation· en· W3179367200 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Moira Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's University
KeywordsPegmatiteInclusion (mineral)GeologyGroup (periodic table)GeochemistryMineralogyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cretaceous (82 Ma) Little Nahanni Pegmatite Group , Canada, is a 15 km long swarm of
\nLCT-type pegmatite dikes that intrude Precambrian to Lower Cambrian siliciclastic metapelites
\nand carbonate rocks. The dykes are dominated by a primary assemblage of quartz, spodumene,
\nK-feldspar ± muscovite lacking both graphic textures and core zones, but characterized by combtextured spodumene and K-feldspar intergrowths. Varying degrees of albitization and lesser
\nphyllic alteration accompany ore-grade oxide enrichment (Ta-Nb and Sn, respectively).A
\ncomprehensive fluid inclusion study using a wide variety of methods (petrography , CL,
\nmicrothermometry, SEM/EDS evaporate mound analysis, LA ICP-MS, laser Raman
\nspectroscopy, δ13C) on minerals (quartz, K-feldspar, albite, spodumene, muscovite, garnet, and
\ntourmaline) from barren and mineralized samples indicate the fluid inclusions are secondary and
\nappear to post-date pegmatite crystallization. The presence of secondary fluid inclusions may
\ninstead represent entrapment during the late-stage (sub-solidus to post crystallization)
\nmetasomatic evolution stage of the pegmatites. Three fluid types occur, and listed in paragenetic
\norder are: (A) an aqueous-carbonic fluid (≤1 wt. % eq. NaCl) with varying XCO2 (0.1 to 0.78),
\npurity (TmCO2= -57o
\nto -61oC), and density; (B) a low-salinity (≤2 wt. % eq. NaCl) aqueous
\nfluid; and (C) an aqueous-methane-nitrogen fluid. SEM-EDS analysis indicates that the fluids are
\nNa (-K) - dominant, but with significant S and enrichment in transition and chalcophile elements.
\nFluid inclusion extracts have δ13C values (-9.7 to -27.7‰; n=7) which indicates exchange of the
\nfluids with the immediate, carbon-bearing wall rocks occurred. Collectively the data indicate: (1)
\nfluids were trapped during the later, metasomatic stage of pegmatite evolution; (2) fluids were
\ntrapped at <2.5 kbars and <350°C with pressure fluctuating between lithostatic and hydrostatic;
\n(3) variable degrees of fluid:rock interaction occurred with the exocontact zone, resulting in
\nvarying XCO2and CO2:CH4 values; and (4) metasomatism and rare metal mineralization
\noccurred in the presence of meteoric water. These findings indicate that the LNPG pegmatites
\nare not a closed system, some of the carbonic component of H2O-CO2 fluids is exotic, and that
\nlow-salinity fluids of meteoric origin infiltrated during the subsolidus stage of pegmatite
\nevolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207