A History of Hungarian Studies as Reflected in Forty-Seven Years of Scholarship: <i>Hungarian Studies Review</i>, 1974–2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Surveying forty-seven years of Hungarian Studies Review, this editorial essay examines some of the major scholarly trends within Hungarian Studies, an interdisciplinary field that took hold in North America after World War II. Energized by the contributions of émigré scholars who fled Hungary in the wake of the 1956 revolution, Hungarian Studies was later shaped by the collapse of state socialism in 1989. Tracing the evolution of the field across different generations of scholars, the essay reflects on the various contributions that Hungarian Studies Review and its precursor The Canadian-American Review of Hungarian Studies have made over the last five decades, not only to discussions of Hungarian politics and history but also to the study of art, literature, and culture, as well as life and community in the diaspora. Highlighting ways in which contributors have pushed the boundaries of the field, the essay also looks at how the journal has provided a forum for scholarship on women and gender, and for studies that, for political reasons, have not always been possible to pursue in Hungary itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.026 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".