MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Effect and Adverse Reactions of Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

2021· article· en· W3179544970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shuxin Bai, Bo Lan, Defang Liu, Ru Pei Liang, Guo Yong Liu, De Bin Wang, Yuan Suo, Wen Jie Sun, Guang Yu Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamilton depression scaleRefractory (planetary science)Electroconvulsive therapyAnxietyDepression (economics)Internal medicineObsessive compulsiveMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAdverse effectPsychologyPsychiatryMedicineCognitionHamdCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To explore the clinical effect and adverse reactions of modified electroconvulsive therapy for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. 76 patients with refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to February 2021 were selected and randomly divide into two groups, with 38 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional drug treatment and the study group was treated with modified electroconvulsive therapy on the basis of the control group. Follow-up was given every 6 w for a total of 12 w and corresponding evaluation was given every follow-up. The total effective rate of the study group was 92.11 %, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (78.95 %) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in Yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale, Hamilton anxiety scale, Hamilton depression scale, Montreal cognitive assessment scale and Tang danlin scores between the two groups before treatment (p>0.05). At the 6th and 12th w after treatment, it increased with time compared with that before treatment, The scores of Yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale, Hamilton depression scale and Hamilton anxiety scale decreased gradually. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The scores of Yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale, Hamilton anxiety scale and Hamilton depression scale in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group at the 6th and 12th w. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), while the Montreal cognitive assessment scale scores and Tang danlin scores of patients in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group at the 6th and 12th w after treatment than before treatment and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The incidence of near memory impairment in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in adverse reactions such as agitation, blurred vision, constipation and abnormal examination items (p>0.05). Modified electroconvulsive therapy for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder has good clinical effect, low adverse reactions and can effectively improve patient’s anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and improve patient’s quality of life and cognitive function. However, there is a high incidence of near memory impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesFrench-language works237,207