MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Parental Support Is Associated With Healthy Movement Behaviours In Children With Disabilities During Covid-19

2021· article· en· W3179794274 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah A. Moore, Ritu Sharma, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Kelly P. Arbour‐Nicitopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicWheelingScreen timeAssociation (psychology)Developmental psychologyPhysical activityMedicinePhysical therapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parental support of healthy movement behaviours (i.e., daily physical activity, PA; reduced sedentary behaviours, SB; and adequate sleep) is important, particularly in children and youth with disabilities (CYWD), who are often less active and more sedentary, on average, compared with typically developing children. The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health restrictions have limited children’s PA and increased SBs and placed significant stress on families of CYWD. Parental support of healthy movement behaviours may be critical in mitigating the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic for CYWD. PURPOSE: To assess the association between parental support and healthy movement behaviours in CYWD during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We recruited parents of school-aged CYWD (n = 151) in April/May 2020. Parents assessed their child’s previous 7-day PA, SB, and sleep, perceived changes in their child’s movement behaviours due to the COVID-19 restrictions, and perceived parental support of their child’s movement behaviours during COVID-19. We assessed the association between movement behaviours and parental factors using Pearson and point-biserial correlations, where * = p < .05 and ** = p < .01. RESULTS: Few CYWD were meeting the combined healthy movement behaviour guidelines (1.3%) during the initial phase (April/May 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Parent encouragement was positively associated with increased child’s outdoor PA (.23**), wheeling, walking, and biking (.19**), indoor PA (.16**), chores (.19*), and family-based PA (.26**). Parental co-play was similarly positively associated with the child’s increased outdoor PA (.26**), wheeling, walking, and biking (.39**), and family-based PA (.26**). Overall parent capability and opportunity to support movement behaviours was positively associated with the child’s increased child’s outdoor PA (.38**), wheeling, walking, and biking (.26**), chores (.16*), and family-based PA (.37**), as well as increased sleep quality (0.31**) and decreased screen time (-.22**). CONCLUSIONS: Parents of CYWD have an important role in encouraging healthy movement behaviours. As we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, return to play recommendations should consider the role of the family in supporting healthy movement behaviours in CYWD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicFamily and Disability Support Research→French-language works237,207→