MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180077821 · doi:10.29173/mlj1044

Bill 11, The Winter Heating Cost Control Act

2008· article· en· W3180077821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Hauk

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Policies and Emissions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)Environmental scienceBusinessEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The initial intention behind BillIl, according to a Manitoba Government news release, was to "keep heating cost increases manageable for Manitoba consumers during a period of instability in natural gas prices.,,2The bill's objectives in accomplishing this goal were twofold: to create a ceiling for the maximum level of natural gas prices; and to establish a fund financed by revenue from electricity exports to control costs and to support conservation, efficiency and alternatives to natural gas.3 This paper will examine stakeholder concerns with respect to natural gas regulation and the government rationale behind the introduction of Bill 11.It will also explore the forces that amended Bill 11, which ultimately led to the enactment of a significantly altered bilL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicEnvironmental Policies and EmissionsFrench-language works237,207