MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180501931 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2874

Abstract 2874: Understanding small cell lung cancer metastasis using circulating tumor cell (CTC)-derived tumor explant (CDX) models

2021· article· en· W3180501931 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Peiris‐Pagès, Mitchell Revill, Derrick Morgan, Stewart Brown, Melanie Galvin, Lynsey Priest, Mathew Carter, Sheila K. Singh, Kristopher K. Frese, Fiona Blackhall, Kathryn Simpson, Caroline Dive

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyMetastasisMedicineTropismParenchymaLungBrain metastasisPrimary tumorCancerEx vivoLung cancerCancer researchBiologyIn vivoInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 13% of all malignant lung tumors and is characterized by an extremely low survival rate and widespread early dissemination. Over two-thirds of SCLC patients are diagnosed with metastases in multiple organs; typically liver, lymph nodes and brain. The number and site of secondary lesions at diagnosis correlates with unfavorable disease outcome. Studying metastasis in SCLC is extremely challenging, as metastatic tumor samples are rarely obtained from these patients. Our laboratory has developed a patient-faithful biobank of >45 SCLC circulating tumor cell (CTC)-derived explants (CDX) models with which to study SCLC1. We implemented a resection protocol using these models to study the metastatic process in SCLC by interrogating the genetic and phenotypic components of metastatic cells using combinations of tissue pathology and next generation sequencing methods. Upon resection of the subcutaneous tumor, we detect the presence of overt macrometastatic lesions in multiple models, which in most cases retain matched organ tropism to that observed in the patient. Whereas all models so far tested disseminated to the lungs, the ATOH1 subtye2 models CDX17, CDX17P, CDX25 and CDX30P predominantly grew in the liver, and CDX3 and CDX3P (ASCL1 subtype3) preferentially colonized the brain despite having a much slower growth. CDX SCLC cells can be isolated from subcutaneous tumors and orthotopically implanted, recapitulating the same tropism. Finally, CDX cells labelled ex vivo can be re-implanted directly into the bloodstream or into the brain parenchyma giving rise to SCLC secondary tumors, providing us with an excellent tool to monitor and study several steps of the metastatic cascade, including extravasation and brain colonization. We report for the first time, brain tropic mouse models of SCLC. Molecular studies are underway to investigate the underlying genetic determinants and mechanisms underpinning metastatic spread of SCLC via transcriptomic studies of matched subcutaneous and metastatic tissues and CTCs in CDX. In parallel, CDX3P is being used to identify markers of pre-metastatic disease and brain colonization at the single cell level to identify novel therapeutic strategies and biomarkers that may benefit the significant number of SCLC patients who present with brain lesions. 1Hodgkinson et al., Nature Medicine 20, 897-903 (2014) 2Simpson et al., Nature Cancer 1, pages437-451(2020) Citation Format: Maria Peiris-Pagès, Mitchell Revill, Derrick Morgan, Stewart Brown, Melanie Galvin, Lynsey Priest, Mathew Carter, Sheila K. Singh, Kristopher Frese, Fiona Blackhall, Kathryn Simpson, Caroline Dive. Understanding small cell lung cancer metastasis using circulating tumor cell (CTC)-derived tumor explant (CDX) models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2874.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.347
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207