MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180565992 · doi:10.22323/1.395.0947

Follow-up of GWTC-2 gravitational wave events with neutrinos from the Super-Kamiokande detector

2021· article· en· W3180565992 on OpenAlexaff
M. Lamoureux, K. Abe, C. Bronner, Y. Hayato, K. Hiraide, M. Ikeda, J. Kameda, Y. Kanemura, Yousuku Kataoka, Shintaro Miki, Makoto Miura, S. Moriyama, Yoshiki Nagao, M. Nakahata, S. Nakayama, K. Okamoto, G. Pronost, H. Sekiya, M. Shiozawa, Yutaro Sonoda, Atsushi Takeda, Y. Takemoto, A. Takenaka, Hidekazu Tanaka, Shuhei Watanabe, T. Yano, S. Han, Takaaki Kajita, K. Okumura, T. Tashiro, Junjie Xia, G. D. Megias, Luis Labarga, Lluis Marti, Bryan Zaldívar, Barry W. Pointon, E. Kearns, J. L. Raaf, L. Wan, T. Wester, Jianming Bian, N. J. Griskevich, William R. Kropp, S. Locke, Shunichi Mine, M. B. Smy, H. W. Sobel, Volodymyr Takhistov, James E. Hill, Jae Yool Kim, In Taek Lim, Ryeong Gyoon Park, Baran Bodur, K. Scholberg, C. W. Walter, L. Bernard, Alice Coffani, Olivier Drapier, A. Giampaolo, Michel Gonin, Th. A. Mueller, Pascal Paganini, Benjamin Quilain, Takeharu Ishizuka, Taku Nakamura, Jae Seung Jang, J. G. Learned, Lauren H.V. Anthony, Daniel Martin, M. Scott, A. A. Sztuc, Yoshi Uchida, V. Berardi, Maria Gabriella Catanesi, Emilio Radicioni, N. F. Calabria, L. N. Machado, G. De Rosa, G. Collazuol, Fabio Iacob, M. Mattiazzi, N. Ospina, L. Ludovici, Yuto Maekawa, Yasuhiro Nishimura, M. Friend, T. Hasegawa, Taku Ishida, T. Kobayashi, Mahesh Jakkapu, T. Matsubara, Takeshi Nakadaira, Kenzo Nakamura, K. Sakashita, Tetsuro Sekiguchi, T. Tsukamoto, T. Boschi, F. Di Lodovico, J. Migenda, Mahdi Taani, S. Zsoldos, Y. Nakano, Hironori Ozaki, Atsumu Suzuki, Y. Takeuchi, Shotaro Yamamoto, Y. Kotsar, Ali Ajmi, Jiahui Feng, T. Kikawa, Masamitsu Mori, T. Nakaya, R. A. Wendell, K. Yasutome, P. Fernández, N. McCauley, Pruthvi Mehta, Ka Ming Tsui, Y. Fukuda, Y. Itow, H. Menjo, Kazufumi Sato, J. Łagoda, S. M. Lakshmi, Piotr Mijakowski, J. Zalipska, Junjie Jiang, C. K. Jung, Michael Wilking, C. Yanagisawa, Masayuki Harada, H. Ishino, S. Ito, Hussain Kitagawa, Y. Koshio, Wenjie Ma, N. Piplani, S. Sakai, G. Barr, Laurence Cook, A. Goldsack, S. Samani, David Wark, Federico Nova, Jeong Yeol Yang, S. J. Jenkins, Matthew Malek, J. M. McElwee, O. Stone, M. D. Thiesse, L.F. Thompson, H. Okazawa, Soo Bong Kim, I. Yu, A. K. Ichikawa, Kiseki Nakamura, K. Nishijima, M. Koshiba, Konosuke Iwamoto, Y. Nakajima, Natsumi Ogawa, M. Yokoyama, K. Martens, M. R. Vagins, M. Kuze, S. Izumiyama, M. Inomoto, M. Ishitsuka, Hiroshi Itô, T. Kinoshita, R. Matsumoto, M. Shinoki, T. Suganuma, J. F. Martin, Hirohisa Tanaka, Trevor Towstego, Ryosuke Akutsu, P. de Perio, Mark Hartz, A. Konaka, N. W. Prouse, Shaomin Chen, Benda Xu, M. Posiadała-Zezula, David Hadley, M. O’Flaherty, Benjamin Richards, Blair Jamieson, John Walker, A. Minamino, Ggiorgio Pintaudi, S. Sano

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsLIGOCherenkov radiationGravitational waveSuper-KamiokandeDetectorNeutrino detectorSolar neutrinoSolar neutrino problemParticle physicsMeasurements of neutrino speedEnergy (signal processing)AstrophysicsAstronomyNeutrino oscillationOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Super-Kamiokande (SK) is a 50-kt water Cherenkov detector, instrumented with $\sim 13$k photo-multipliers and running since 1996. It is sensitive to neutrinos with energies ranging from 4.5 MeV to several TeV. A new framework has been developed for the follow-up of gravitational wave (GW) alerts issued by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration (LVC). Neutrinos are searched for, using a 1000-second time window centered on the alert time and in both SK low-energy and high-energy samples. Such observation can then be used to constrain the neutrino emission from the GW source. The significance of potential signals has been obtained by comparing neutrino direction with the localization of the GW. The computation of limits on incoming neutrino flux and on the total energy emitted in neutrinos by the source has been performed for the different neutrino flavors. The results using the LVC GWTC-2 catalog (covering O3a period) are presented, as well as the outlooks for the future real-time public release of follow-ups for the O4 period (in 2022) and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207