Variations in the Near‐Infrared Spectral Properties of Ferrous Mineral Mixtures With Different Relative Abundances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In near‐infrared spectral studies, the relationship between the 1‐μm absorption (Band I) center and the band area ratio (BAR, the area ratio of 2–1‐μm absorption features) is useful in compositional and mineralogical analyses of ferrous mineral‐bearing mixtures. Zhang and Cloutis (2020), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001153 , investigated various lunar ferrous iron‐bearing rocks and minerals and found that pyroxene‐bearing materials rich in ilmenite (Ilm), plagioclase (Pl), or glass are offset from the lunar olivine‐clinopyroxene‐orthopyroxene (Ol‐Cpx‐Opx) mixing line in the plot of the BAR versus the Band I center. To analyze the variation trends of the spectral properties of these mixtures with different components, this study presents a systematic evaluation of laboratory spectra of terrestrial and synthetic ferrous iron‐bearing mineral mixtures based on published databases. In general, the mixing trends of the Pl‐pyroxene mixtures, the glass‐pyroxene mixtures, and the Ilm‐basalt mixtures are consistent with the findings of Zhang and Cloutis (2020), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001153 . Moreover, this study also finds that the BAR of the Pl‐pyroxene mixtures varies nonlinearly with different relative abundances and that the BAR is generally not sensitive to Pl abundances below 60%. For glass‐pyroxene mixtures, the corresponding data points are usually appreciably offset from the Ol‐Cpx‐Opx mixing line at glass abundances above 20%. The BAR of the Ilm‐basalt mixtures increases with increasing Ilm content, mainly due to the weakening of 1‐μm absorption generally being greater than that of 2‐μm absorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it