MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180661819

Feed-borne biogenic amines: Natural toxicants or growth promotors?

2000· article· es· W3180661819 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor K. Smith, Mireya Tapia‐Salazar, Lucia-Elizabeth Cruz-Suarez, Denis Ricque-Marie

Bibliographic record

VenueAvances en Nutrición Acuicola · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPutrescineCadaverineSpermineSpermidineChemistryFood scienceBiochemistryPolyamineFood spoilageBiologyEnzymeBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biogenic amines are biologically active compounds synthesized from amino acids. Feedbornebiogenic amines are most commonly synthesized by spoilage microorganisms and are usuallyconsidered to be potential toxins. There has also been interest in aquacultural circles in the potentialchemoattractant properties of these compounds. A subgroup of the biogenic amines are the mammalianpolyamines: putrescine, spermidine and spermine. The polyamines are cationic compounds synthesized frommethionine and ornithine in short, highly regulated pathways. The polyamines are anabolic compounds withhormone-like properties. It has been proposed that exogenous dietary polyamines may play an important rolein promoting growth and maintaining health. A series of experiments have been conducted with chicks fed acrystalline amino acid-based purified diet. Chicks were fed dietary supplements of putrescine, spermidine,spermine and cadaverine. Although all these compounds promoted intestinal tract development, onlyputrescine promoted whole body growth. Dietary putrescine was also shown to overcome the toxicity of rawlegumes when added to chick diets. Putrescine was also shown to increase intestinal development and wholebody growth of turkey poults fed a practical diet. Laying hens fed diets supplemented with putrescine had adecrease in egg shell deformations and increased egg shell thickness. In experiments with blue shrimp(Litopenaeus stylirostris), shrimp diets were supplemented separately with cadaverine, histamine, putrescine,spermidine and spermine. Spermine was observed to have the greatest growth promoting potential in shrimp.Spermine was added to diets at 0, 500, 1100, 2300, 3400 and 4600 mg kg-1. Significant quadratic responseswere seen in final weight, weight gain and feed conversion ratio. Whole body polyamine concentrations werealso altered by diet while trends were seen in concentrations of polyamines in the heptopancreas. It wasconcluded that supplemental dietary spermine can promote the growth of blue shrimp and that this effect islikely due to altered polyamine metabolism. Biogenic amines should not always be considered as potentialtoxicants and chemoattractants, therefore, but can also be considered to be non-hormonal growth promotants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvances en Nutrición AcuicolaSame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207