MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180735302 · doi:10.2215/cjn.00920121

Gene Expression Profiling in Kidney Transplants with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Adverse Events

2021· article· en· W3180735302 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsMedicineImmune checkpointImmune systemCancer researchImmunologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objectives Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used to treat various malignancies, but their application in patients with kidney transplants is complicated by high allograft rejection rates. Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated rejection is a novel, poorly understood entity demonstrating overlapping histopathologic features with immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis, which poses a challenge for diagnosis and clinical management. We sought to improve the understanding of these entities through biopsy-based gene expression analysis. Design, setting, participants, & measurements NanoString was used to measure and compare the expression of 725 immune-related genes in 75 archival kidney biopsies, including a 25-sample discovery cohort comprising pure T cell–mediated rejection and immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis and an independent 50-sample validation cohort comprising immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis, immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated T cell–mediated rejection, immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated crescentic GN, drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis, BK virus nephropathy, and normal biopsies. Results Significant molecular overlap was observed between immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis and T cell–mediated rejection. Nevertheless, IFI27 , an IFN- α– induced transcript, was identified and validated as a novel biomarker for differentiating immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated T cell–mediated rejection from immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis (validation cohort: P <0.001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =100%, accuracy =86%). Principal component analysis revealed heterogeneity in inflammatory gene expression patterns within sample groups; however, immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated T cell–mediated rejection and immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated acute interstitial nephritis both demonstrated relatively more molecular overlap with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis than T cell–mediated rejection, suggesting potential dominance of hypersensitivity mechanisms in these entities. Conclusions These results indicate that, although there is significant molecular similarity between immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated rejection and acute interstitial nephritis, biopsy-based measurement of IFI27 gene expression represents a potential biomarker for differentiating these entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it